


Keywords: solar-terrestrial physics, planetary influences on solar activity, solar neutrinos, sunspots, solar activity, Field-dynamical Planetary Model, Field-dynamical Earth Model

As with all the web pages on the Living Cosmos web site, this web page is a fully referenced work, and is only a portion of the factual, empirical support for the ideas presented. However, these references are not included on this web page, but are included in the book, The Vital Vastness. This book is now published with the full scope and references, and is available for purchase. An attempt will be made to address queries, but not all queries can be answered. Excerpts are presented here as indented paragraphs, and those lines appearing with quotes are from some of the cited references.


You don't pay more, we just get a commission -- Click here for more advertisers.
Table of Contents

You don't pay more, we just get a commission -- Click here for more advertisers.

There are a number of observations that indicate that sunspots, flares and other solar activity
are triggered by remote fields. Surface features, such as coronal transients and magnetic arcs,
take place before flares. It is well known that theories suggesting internal forces as
responsible are flawed, and flares are best described as an exploding current. Furthermore,
flares reappear in essentially the same location, indicating a stability that could not be
achieved by internal processes, since the explosive nature of solar erupts would disrupt any
uniform flow. In fact, coherent radio emissions were observed from a large sunspot producing
bursts from a maser, the radio equivalent of a laser, and electron beams. These require much
more stability than would occur from an internal process. Also, white-light flares are produced
from energy above the solar surface and flares take place at different depths of the solar
surface. The question is where do the remote fields come from? The evidence points to the
planets and their solar linkage.
Theories of planetary influences on solar activity have a long history. Again, as is so typical
of the current mind-set in the physical sciences, these observations have been attributed to
gravitational effects, but gravitational effects are far too weak. Because of this, some
scientists have denied any planetary influence exists, but the effect is not gravitational.
Rather, the effect is electromagnetic. These influences are the result of a new Earth model,
referred to as the Field-dynamical Earth Model
(FEM), and the other planets are similar at this level, referred to as a
Field-dynamical Planetary Model.
Here are some excerpts from The Vital Vastness -- Volume Two: The Living Cosmos.
Notwithstanding, a number of observations indicate that the Earth and other planets trigger
solar activity. Flares do not form at the brightest x-ray point in sunspots, and other types
of solar activity, which indicates that the trigger is far from the site. Also the magnetic
fields are continuous, but would not be if they were the result of internal processes. Internal
motions would disrupt an internal field. In fact, some flares affect different depths of the
solar surface (i.e., corona, chromosphere or photosphere), which is another indication of a
remote field.
The Earth's magnetic field undergoes changes of intensity that reflect the magnitude of changes
in solar activity before they take place on the Sun. This study took
into account eight solar cycles totaling 89 years (1884 to 1972). The observations disclosed
that magnetic data for the Earth at sunspot minimum indicates the "depth" of the
following maximum.
Furthermore, the majority of solar maximums take place in a period around the vernal equinox.
The scientist that conducted the study states: "Of the 21 maximums occurring during the
period 1750-1970 thirteen take place during the 4-month period February-May, while only four
occur during each of the periods June-September and October-January." Flare formation
around the time of the March or vernal equinox unveils the effects of the Earth. After all,
months are relative to the Earth's motion around the Sun, not the Sun itself.
These seasonal variations are also noted in naked-eye Oriental sunspot sightings, which show a
peak in March, and a secondary peak in April. A third peak is noted around the December
solstice. This effect is not random, and it has been suggested that late winter-early spring
dust storms obscured sightings in other seasons, bringing about this effect. However, this does
not explain the December peak, a time when there were winter thunderstorms, especially during
solar maximums. Furthermore, dust storms have more often been an aid, rather than a hindrance,
to naked eye viewing of the Sun.
More recent solar events also show these peaks, as well. Major solar activity was noted for
June 1988, March 1989, March 1990, March and June 1991, and so on. Some of the strongest solar
proton events also occur around these times. The strongest proton events for certain years are
24 September 1978; 13 October 1981; 13 July 1982; 26 April 1984; 13 and 18 March 1989; 13 August
1989; 30 September 1989; 20 October 1989; 1 December 1989; 24 March 1991; 11 June 1991; 8 July
1991; 9 May 1992; 31 October 1991; 21 February 1994; and 21 April 1998 (all are 1,700 pfu @ > 10
MeV or greater). All of these events are within five weeks, some are within a few weeks or days,
of the equinoxes or solstices. In fact, the strongest was 24 March 1991, just a few days
following the vernal equinox (43,000 pfu @ > 10 MeV). Moreover, in 1991 there were very strong
solar activity, solar flares, and geomagnetic storms that revealed the FEM-solar linkage. Other
facts confirm the FEM-solar linkage (as will be shown throughout this chapter).
One such fact is the 1913 and 1969 jerks of the geomagnetic field, which are correlated with the
11-year solar cycle. Shifts in the geomagnetic field peak first, then
solar activity. Again, this phenomenon indicates that the Earth is responsible for the solar
transformations; it is a matter of cause and effect. Further support for this linkage is
evident in theories that attribute the polar jerks to both internal and solar variations.
Impulses were first attributed to internal processes, but were later correlated to solar
activity. The reason they are attributed to both is that FEM and the Sun are a single unit.
Polar jerks, reversals and wander will be discussed in section 5.7. The entire solar-FEM
linkage can be noted in the fact that solar activity, geomagnetic activity, changes in the
length of day (i.e., the Earth's rotation), and various geophysical phenomena, including climate,
earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions are correlated.
The vernal equinox is a time when the Earth has both poles oriented perpendicular to the
ecliptic plane, and is moving toward the Sun, making it an ideal time for interaction with the
solar wind and Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF). Geomagnetic activity reaches a maximum
around the time of the equinoxes, with the largest variations in spring and fall, as well as
daily and annual variations, and this effect is controlled by the Earth's interaction with the
IMF.
Due to the interactions between the IMF and geomagnetic field (GMF), there is a twelve-month
wave in geomagnetic activity with a maximum at the March (vernal) and September (autumnal)
equinoxes. The largest sunspot average effect on the Sun's Northern Hemisphere switched to the
largest effect on the Southern Hemisphere in 1913, the year of a polar jerk. This occurred
along with the deepest solar activity minimum since 1811. Also, it was a year when solar motion
around the center of mass (barycenter) attained a minimum. The conclusion is inescapable:
"It seems, however, that these phenomena are the result of a common cause."
One of the most established connections between the Earth and Sun is the close correlations
between changes in the Earth's magnetic field, and fluctuations in the coming and going of
sunspots. So interconnected are these fields that the polarity of the IMF can be inferred by
observations of the Earth's magnetic field. An Earthly influence on solar activity has been
commented upon by one scientist who proposes that the GMF could be a strange attractor due to
some type of oscillations, and thereby, creates turbulent flow. Others claim that different
mechanisms are responsible for an Earthly influence on solar activity.
Observations near the Earth also confirm a solar-FEM linkage in solar activity. The most
energetic solar flare phenomena are associated with what are called Ground Level Events (GLE).
All GLE between 1942 and 1978 displayed no delay in onset times; they occurred on the Sun and
Earth simultaneously. In order to explain this, the IMF must intersect "open field lines
connected to Earth." Such events are only partly accelerated on site, but also in the
heliosphere, which extends beyond the planets.
It was noted that an active boundary of the IMF (current sheet), and plasma layers in the
geomagnetic field (GMF) were surrounding a strong rotation of the GMF that contained compressed
and heated solar wind plasma. This observation reveals one of the IMF-GMF interactions that
take place. An enhanced field strength and considerable wave activity direction is noted, but
not in the direction predicted by the magnetic stresses across the boundary. The source of the
energy and momentum were unknown. However, the unknown is the Polar Field of FEM interacting
with the IMF, and accelerating the solar wind earthward. This is why solar wind streams display
a pronounced local depletion of ion concentrations near the Earth. In contrast, during quiet
periods the Earth is one of the main sources of protons.
The Moon, which influences Earthly phenomena (as will be discussed in this chapter), is also
observed in solar activity. A lunar effect is indicated in proton counts (1952-1963), and
neutron counts (1958-1963) near the Earth (i.e., the lunar mean synodic rotation of 27.3 days,
and the synodic month of 29.5 days, which is especially beyond random distribution). There is
also a lunar influence on the occurrence of aurora. The Moon influences the dynamics of FEM by
triggering particle flow, which in turn may influence the Sun due to the solar-FEM linkage.
Other indications of an Earthly influence on solar activity have been noted. Only 25% of all
solar flares cause magnetic disturbances at the Earth (geomagnetic storms). However, as stated,
the Earth's magnetic field always reveals solar activity prior to that activity.
Even flare formation and aurora formation are very similar. Hydrogen (-alpha) flares develop
in about 20 to 30 minutes, and auroral substorms in about 30 minutes. In x-ray and microwaves
the flare occurs in less than a minute, and auroral intensity increases two to three orders of
magnitude in about a minute. Both have x-ray emissions and electron spectra that are similar.
An astrophysicist makes the inevitable statement: "It is fascinating to infer that an
auroral 'curtain' and a flare 'ribbon' are produced by similar processes."
Large-scale fluctuations of the solar wind occur in the Earth's vicinity (1 AU), and display a
period of four days. The intermediate-frequency fluctuations occur in periods from
approximately nine hours to four days, and low-frequency from about four days to the solar
rotational period. In addition, there are periods of three to four days in Interplanetary
Magnetic Field phenomena. All these phenomena have a common period of four days.
A number of phenomena on Earth have a period of four days, and this is associated with the
time-varying aspects of the Fields. There is a 4-day period in mid-latitude electron zone flow
induced by lightning. Thunderstorms increase about four days after cosmic-ray events (e.g.,
flares). The electrical potential change in the lower troposphere and radioactive elements
(radionuclides; e.g., Be7) increase about four days after solar eruptions. Likewise,
when the IMF sector structure passes the Earth there is an increase in the size of cyclones
(VAI; Vorticity Area Index), which peaks in about four days. Weather events, earthquakes, and
other geophysical phenomena also display a 4-day period (this will be discussed). Putting it
all into perspective, the life connection of FEM can be seen in the fact that all life on Earth
has a "preperception," four days prior to magnetic changes on
Earth that are later caused by solar events. To better state this, life on Earth contributes to
the functioning of FEM, which in turn influences the Sun, and this then affects FEM.
Further support for this understanding is afforded by observations of the interrelationships
between the geomagnetic field (GMF) and the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF). The aurora
known as the Theta-arc configuration occurs along a certain structure of the IMF, which is the
north-directed IMF (i.e., the y-component). Dynamics of the Earth's polar region, where
auroras take place (i.e., polar cusp), are related to IMF solar wind particles when they are
injected into the region where the northward IMF and GMF lines merge. The IMF carries shock
waves that cause geomagnetic storms, and corresponds with other polar phenomena (such as, the
electrostatic potential). The active regions of the IMF, at 0o to 40o
latitudes, are ideal for interaction with the Earth's orbital plane, which is inclined
7o to the solar equator. The IMF's annual change form toward or away form the Sun
occurs when the heliographic latitude of the Earth is 0o, and this IMF shift depends
on which solar pole is tipped toward the Earth. So interconnected are the GMF and IMF that the
polarity of the IMF can be deduced from observations of the GMF.
As discussed, the IMF and GMF interact more during the equinoxes, and one pole during the
solstice. As a result, there is a maximum in geomagnetic activity during the equinoxes due to
the Earth's inclination on it axis relative to the IMF. The strongest activity occurs when open
field lines merge, particularly when the IMF is southward with maximums just following the
equinoxes on about 5 April and 6 October.
Processes other than the Sun and the IMF are required to accelerate the solar wind in
interplanetary space. Not realizing that the Earth's and other planets' Fields influence solar
activity and the solar wind, scientists make comments like these: "The nature of the
sources of accelerated particles is still unclear." "The nature of the Sun's magnetic
field and the processes that cause sunspot-belt flux to erupt as observed remain enigmatic."
In contrast, another scientist comments on the Earth's influence: "The phenomena observed
indicate that the Earth also apparently repels sunspots to the farther side of the Sun."
Other studies also indicate the Earth has an influence on solar activity.
Numerous flare observations confirm that a mechanism(s) outside the Sun triggers flares and
sunspots. Studies of flares indicate that there are mechanisms that are overlying
the Sun's surface. For example, the charge interchange with atomic and ionized
hydrogen at particle sources appears to require two different acceleration mechanisms. The
preexisting field on the Sun must be moved "aside" for the emerging flux to develop.
Flare loops form through a magnetic reconnection in a local, outwardly extended and external
magnetic field. Magnetic disturbances at the Earth and corotating, high-speed streams are so
co-fluctuating that the magnetic disturbances have been used to determine solar activity,
including seasonal peaks. A team of scientists explain this phenomenon: "That such similar
structure is observed in the same phase of different cycles over such a long time (up to tens of
years) suggests a quite stable source structure for the geomagnetic disturbances generated by
the corotating structure in the solar wind." The Sun and Earth are a single unit when it
comes to solar activity.
Aside from solar maximums occurring more around the vernal equinox, and the Earth's magnetic
field indicating the depth of the following maximum, there are other connections with FEM.
Solar cycles fluctuations in phenomena on Earth and the life upon it are well known. For
example, a double solar cycle of 22 years is apparent in the heavy hydrogen (deuterium) to
hydrogen (D/H) ratios in fossilized tree wood. This shows that there are cyclic variations in
air or water temperature that are in accord with solar cycles. The thickness of annual sediment
layers also display a 22-year cycle. There are many similar cyclic correlations that will be
discussed in section 5.2, and cannot be explained solely by the relatively minor fluctuations
in solar output.
Life and the electrical potential of the Earth vary with solar activity. There is a minimum
(1.0 GV; gigavolt) at sunspot minimum, and a maximum (2.7 GV) at solar maximum, which is also
reflected in magnetic disturbances on Earth. The air and Earth potentials fluctuate with life.
For example, tree potentials (L-fields) shift along with the Earth's magnetic and electric
activity, the light-dark cycles, and lunar cycles.
Chemical reactions (Piccardi Tests) on Earth peak first, then solar
activity. These chemical reactions are also correlated with magnetic storms, sudden cosmic-ray
bombardments, solar flares, and have an annual cycle with a peak, like solar activity, around
the March (vernal) equinox. This chemical-reaction effect is also apparent in living things.
All life on Earth, even the simplest creatures, such as bacteria, display behavioral and
physiological changes four days prior to magnetic disturbances on Earth
that are later caused by solar activity. In turn, alternating electromagnetic fields, like
those that accompany geomagnetic storms, are biologically active, changing animals (systolic)
rhythms, bioelectricity, and blood dynamics.
A highly significant statistical test indicates that the economy (GNP and Price Index), which is
actually a measure of the life destroyed, has an influence on solar activity, and not
the other way around. Finally, it is a well-known fact that when cycles of the
same length here on Earth coincide with solar cycles, it is the Earth's that peaks
first. Section 5.2 will illustrate this further.
Other observations bring conformation of this relationship. Polar faculae of the Sun have been
observed more since 1951, during minimums. Faculae are produced by solar plasma that is
accelerated into the poles of the Sun. The 1950s were a time when the world economy became more
industrialized (post-World War II) and solar activity began a new maximum. Since that time
these faculae first appeared and continue to reappear. The Sun is maintaining its fusion
reactions in response to more losses in the solar wind than previously.
An Earthly influence on sunspots was discussed as far back as 1907, and has continually
reappeared in scientific literature since then. The 1907 article was called "An Apparent
Influence of the Earth on the Number and Areas of Sunspots in the Cycle 1889-1901." A
recent review of these data leads a present-day scientist to conclude that the Earth triggers
sunspots.
From section 5.2 the discussion is focused on cycles of solar activity and those of Earthly
phenomena, and here is another reference to the GNP:
"In an attempt to identify the limitation of exogeneity testing, we gathered data on a
'classic' question in economics. Is there a causal relationship between sunspots and the
business cycle? On the basis of the evidence, we... are forced to conclude that the U.S.
economy has a significant impact on the Sun, but that sunspots have no influence on the economy.
We were, of course, more than a little surprised to the find that the U.S. economy has any
influence on the Sun. However, as [others have] said so well, one 'would have to be rather
more pigheaded in order not to have the evidence change his views.' We agree that identifying
the linkages constitutes an important topic of future research."
Want to know more about this subject? Click here.
For a related topic see the web page on
cycles
This is also true of the other planets, and this is one of the reasons why we observe planetary
periods in solar activity. It has been known for a long time that planetary positions that
create angles of 0o, 90o, 180o, 270o, or two planets
at 180o with the third at 90o affect short-wave radio reception, and radio
signals due to increased solar activity. These angles are typical of the dynamics of electric
and magnetic field interactions. From 1952 onwards, forecasting based on this understanding
alone has been 80% effective.
The Earth in an angular relationship with any of the other planets, such as Venus-Earth
configurations, influences the formation of sunspots. Configurations involving Mercury, Earth
and Venus show some of the greatest effects. A 110-day cycle of angular acceleration between
Venus, Earth and Jupiter is correlated to energetic x-ray bursts. The sources can be noted in
the observation that the solar wind is associated with the local depletion of ion concentrations
in the Venus and Earth ionospheres.
The four outer, largest planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus) are the most important for
determining the position of the Sun, and the center of mass in the Solar System. The three
closest (Mercury, Venus and Earth) are the most important for causing the jerk or change of
acceleration of the Sun. These influences are the greatest gravitational effects, which are
still far too weak to cause the observed shifts in solar activity.
The terms used to describe the angles between the planets are conjunction (0o),
square (90o), and opposition (180o), all of which are noted in effects on
solar activity. When Venus and Earth are in opposition there are 60% more sunspots than during
conjunction. When the Earth, Venus and Jupiter are in conjunction, there are even more sunspots.
A study covering a 300-year period disclosed that sunspots increase when Jupiter and Saturn are
in conjunction, square and opposition. Uranus and Neptune are in square during maximums, and in
conjunction or opposition during minimums. The positions of Mercury, Venus, Earth and Jupiter
are correlated with solar proton events. Mercury's revolution around the Sun is also a solar
cycle (87.976 days). When Venus, Earth and Jupiter are on the same side of the Sun with Mercury
at closest approach (perihelion) the effect doubles. That is, Mercury's orbital period in
sunspot data also depends on the phases of Venus, Earth and Jupiter. The conclusions from the
data are clear: "There is a close link between various planetary alignments and the dates
of sunspot maxima and minima."
The influence is a combination of electromagnetic fields in dynamic interaction that overcome
the gravitational (tidal) forces. This is why studies that claim gravitational forces are
responsible have been put into the skeptics corner, so to speak, and have somewhat discredited
this whole area of study. Gravitational forces are far too weak to be responsible for the
effects.
This electromagnetic long-range force is also why there are planetary periods in sunspots. What
particularly illustrates this is that Pluto, the farthest (most of the time) and smallest of the
planets, has a period that shows up in sunspot data. The influence cannot possibly be
gravitational, as a scientist exclaims: "These planetary influences cannot be gravitational,
but must be magnetic or electrical in character." Planetary positions have been used to
predict solar flares, which is not explainable by gravitational effects. A scientist studying
planetary positions and solar activity makes a comment that reflects the limitations of present
perspectives: "There was as yet no understanding of why this should be."
The five outer planets' orbital (synodic) periods display close associations with sunspot
periods, with the exception of Neptune. A scientist expresses concern over this enigma:
"Note that, in spite of its size and great distance from the Sun, Pluto is included as one
of the planets involved in a synodic period associated with a sunspot period. This is most
surprising. Pluto is the most eccentric of the planets; Neptune, next to Venus, is the least
eccentric. In fact, Neptune's orbit is almost exactly circular."
The reason Neptune's synodic period does not show up in sunspot periods is due to the way in
which Neptune's magnetic field is offset in relation to the ecliptic plane and the IMF. It is
not anywhere near the angular interactions that the other planets have with the IMF. This is
also evident in lower radio emissions and an offset auroral zone that rotates with Neptune away
from the Sun and the IMF.
Not only do planetary synodic periods correlate with solar activity, but also variations from
orbital eccentricity are found in sunspot periods. Conjunctions of Jupiter and the center of
mass of the Solar System (barycenter) have been used to predict energetic x-ray flares.
Planetary effects on solar activity have been shown in numerous other studies. Many scientists
acknowledge that the effect is not gravitational (i.e., tidal).
Want to know more about this subject? Click here.
Recent observations show that the Sun is discharging only one-third of the expected number of
neutrinos. This greater solar efficiency is in disagreement with the supposedly
well-established theory of stellar evolution. Therefore, the Sun's mechanisms are not
understood or the classical theory of neutrinos is wrong. Both possibilities are unattractive
to conventional theorists. Admittedly, a scientist relates: "Something else in the Sun has
to be efficiently transferring energy out of the center." This greater efficiency is also
suggested by the long-term (secular) variability of solar activity.
The biggest surprise was that neutrinos fluctuate in relation to the solar cycle. Less
neutrinos are emitted during solar maximum, but they should not vary, except on a timescale of
billions of years. A neutrino with a large magnetic-moment can interact with strong magnetic
fields, causing the spin of the neutrino to flip from left-handed to a right-handed helicity,
and thereby, go unobserved in the experiments. That is, the weak interaction coupling (constant)
occurs mostly with left-handed spins, and the experiments were designed with this perspective
in mind. The spin conversion would have to occur at or above the solar surface, or it would
not be correlated to the solar cycle. Therefore, a strong magnetic interaction that originates
from outside the Sun is required, because sunspots are bubbles of less
dense material coming off the solar surface (e.g., magnetic flux tubes). This sunspot-cycle
effect by itself could not bring about the required conditions with only the Sun, and therefore,
remote fields are required. The facts at this level also encourage the idea that the remote
fields of the planets are involved in solar activity, and this correlates with fluctuations in
neutrinos.
A serious shortfall of solar neutrinos was revealed in more recent data from the Soviet-American
Gallium Experiment or SAGE. The gallium interacts with low-energy neutrinos created in the
prime energy producing reactions of the Sun, but their detected levels were far too low. This
statement hints at the Earth's influence: "Such a low rate provides strong evidence that
electron-neutrinos somehow disappear between their creation and reaching the Earth."
Notwithstanding, it has also been suggested that the neutrino shortfall could be the result of
an energy source in the Earth's core, as described for
FEM.
In fact, the present theory of flare formation relies on magnetic flux tubes beneath the surface,
in the photosphere, while no photospheric process can produce the energy required. Before a
flare, dramatic, relative motions of sunspots indicate force-free fields that produce a twisting
or shear of the magnetic field lines. Force-free and field-aligned currents are essential to
flare occurrence. Furthermore, vortex flows are essential for generating field-aligned currents,
while electrons carrying the upward field-aligned currents must be streaming down into a deeper
layer, the chromosphere. One group of scientists summarizes:
"Considering all the evidence, it seems that a full solution of the solar neutrino puzzle
requires something in addition to the hypothesis of neutrino magnetic moments. The primary
concern is the possibility that ordinary cosmic rays, by some unknown process, contaminate the
37-Ar data and lead to a correlation with solar activity through the modulation of galactic
cosmic rays. Nonetheless, perhaps some other vector could mediate between the cosmic rays and
the detector."
Statements like this suggest planetary fields are interacting with the solar surface, causing
the spin flip of the neutrino, as well as the other observations. This is especially true of
FEM, because the detector is on Earth, and therefore, the spin flip must take place before
reaching the Earth's surface. Then again, as indicated by scientists, this could be due to the
fact that the Earth has an energy source deep within its interior, as noted with FEM.
The Vital Vastness continues with other observations that confirm the
planetary influences on solar activity. The Earth, however, is the most influential of the
planets. This can be seen in the history of solar activity and how it fluctuates with the
waxing and waning of civilization. As civilizations spread and destroy wilderness, they offset
the dynamics of the Field-dynamical Earth Model (FEM), and due to its solar linkage triggers
solar activity. This is also evident in the Modern Maximum in solar activity, fairly recent
solar features, and geophysical effects beginning with the Industrial Revolution, and
compounding effects from post-World War II on, when industrialization began a sweeping impact
on the biosphere.
Want to know more about this subject? Click here.
For one example of the fluctuation of solar activity with historical events see the web page
In Defense of Nature: The History Nobody Told
You About.
Introduction

Earthly Influences on Solar Activity

that streams towards the Sun. This hooked-shaped "tail"
of plasma is seen in the top-left. This observation was unexpected
as the magnetosphere is believed to be the interaction between the
solar wind and the Earth's magnetic lines of force. The expected scenario
would be that the solar wind pushes back the magnetic lines of force away
from the Sun, not towards the Sun, as shown here. In actuality it is an observation
of the field of the Earth (FEM) that triggers solar activity. This photo was taken by
the Extreme Ultraviolet imager aboard the spacecraft IMAGE. (NASA photo)
When considering all of the observations, they call for a spiraling electromagnetic
helix typical of the Fields on the planets, like the Polar Fields' and their helical auroras.
These Fields are accelerated towards the Sun's surface by a coupling with the Interplanetary
Magnetic Field; abbreviated IMF (see Figure 4). A solar physicist's comments strongly indicate
that the Field-dynamical Model of the planets are at work: "The similarity of auroral
particle acceleration to the solar flare case has suggested to several authors that the same
acceleration mechanisms may explain both phenomena. It seems likely that more than one
acceleration mechanism may be necessary to explain all observations." A planetary
correlation with sunspots has been claimed by many scientists throughout the years, but has
been denied by others, because no mechanism was known, and gravitational effects are far too
weak.
This relationship is also apparent in the Gross National Product (GNP) and the
Wholesale Price Index, both of which are a measure of the life destroyed in the manufacture of
goods and the waste generated. A study compared these indexes over a time period from 1889 to
1978 with sunspot cycles, and disclosed the causal factor. In this article, "Sunspots and
Cycles: A Test of Causation," in which the authors state:

Planetary Influences on Solar Activity
The Earth is not the only planet to display an influence on the formation of
sunspots, though it is the most influential. Electron acceleration has been observed near
Jupiter, not only along magnetic field lines, but across the regular magnetic field and toward
the Sun. In fact, some of these electrons have been noted in the Earth's orbit. An
astrophysicist's comment reveals what could be expected of a time-varying accelerator,
"the source acts for some days and is then switched off."

Observations of solar neutrinos confirm both the structure of the Sun, and the
influence of planetary Fields on solar activity. Solar neutrinos are subatomic particles
produced by the nuclear reactions that take place within the Sun. A direct test of how the Sun
produces its luminosity is to observe the quantity of neutrinos that are emitted.

These web sites are not meant to be an exhaustive listing of reliable souces on the World Wide Web, but they are very important, and in some cases, very through and exceptionally interesting.
This website's resources are sorted by the name of the web page or service. This NASA website provides links to everything on solar physics wit links to 83 websites.
The Dynamics Explorer observes the interaction between the Sun and the Earth, particularly the Earth's magnetosphere and the dynamics behind the auroras. This Los Alamos National Laboratory site provides a guide to online data from the Dynamics Explorer, links to instrumentation, the Aurora Image Page (some very interesting and beautiful auroras), the National Space Science Data Center, magnetospheric online data, the Space Physics Data System, and more. There is also another site for the Dynamics Explorer at the University of Iowa.
The Transition Region and Coronal Explorer is a NASA Small Explorer (SMEX) mission used to take images of the solar corona and transition region at high angular and temporal resolution. The TRACE project maintains an Open Data Policy: all data are available from data archives as soon as the spacecraft data have been processed.
IMAGE uses neutral atom, ultraviolet, and radio imaging techniques to: (1) Identify the dominant mechanisms for injecting plasma into the magnetosphere on substorm and magnetic storm time-scales; (2) Determine the directly driven response of the magnetosphere to solar wind changes; and, (3) Discover how and where magnetospheric plasmas are energized, transported, and subsequently lost during substorms and magnetic storms.
This European Space Agency (ESA) website provides links to the Auroral Observatory in Norway, European space centers, solar-terrestrial centers, U.S. space centers, the Space Radiation 4.0 for Windows software for modelling ionizing radiation in space, and much more.
The GeoTail Mission is an international effort involving NASA, ESA, and ISAS to study the geomagnetic tail region of the magnetosphere. For more on the mission see this NASA spacelink.
This NASA site offers information on the experiments, data, overviews, and more. Another link is avaiable for the ISEE International Sun-Earth Explorer.
This NASA website provides information on the experiments, data, overviews, and more on the Interplanetary Monitoring Platform (IMP). The IMP is designed to study interplanetary and magnetospheric cosmic rays, energetic solar particles, plasma, electric and magnetic fields, and solar activity in general. Another link on the mission's overview is available.
This NASA website offers an overview of the mission, data, information on experiments, and more on this solar-terrestrial physics mission. Another link provides a mission overview.
This NASA website offers an index, solar wind data, polar observations, the SOHO and Geotail missions, space projects, and more.
This NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center website has links to branches of the laboratory, observatory reports, information on the laboratory, Space Sciences Directorate, Goddard Homepage, and NASA Homepage.
Here at this NOAA site we find links to 84 websites with solar-terrestrial physics as the focal point.
This international NASA/ESA/ISAS effort studies the polar regions on Earth in the visible spectrum. The website also porvides information on instruments, images, small comets, movies, aurora, publications, and more.
NASA's Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) Homepage provides a mission overview, images, resources for teaching, a data archive, software, publications, and a search engine for specific information.
This observatory monitors the flux of solar neutrinos. Experiments performed to detect solar neutrinos were made to test our theories on the physics of the Sun. However, the flux of solar neutrinos was half of what was expected from theory.
Current research, publications, images, links to solar-terrestrial physics sites, links to data, links to space weather, and information on the Mercury and SAMPEX missions are provided.
Produced by the Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, this site offers information on general cosmic ray and space resources, interactive data sources, other comprehensive data sources, space mission data, space physics, journals, newsletters, and conferences.
This site provides information and links on Sun-Earth connections, space physics sites, a space physics data system, a glossary of solar-terrestrial terms, aurora, NASA flight programs, magentospheric plasma, ionospheric plasma, and solar and eclipse images.
Anyone interested in all aspects of space physics will love this site. There are loads of information, data, archives, links to other sites, flight projects, and more.
This University of Michigan site provides the history of space physics, research, movies, hot links, technology, and more.
These sites include data links and search capabilities.
Hot topics, a subject catalog, and links to institutions, organizations, and related virtual libraries are available.
This website offers a wealth of information on the sun, including solar structure, solar features, the sun in action (sunspot cycles, flares, helioseismology, etc.), research areas, projects, and more.
This site offers a wealth of information on the sun, including news stories about the sun, space missions studying the sun, solar structure, solar features, the sun in action (sunspot cycles, flares, helioseismology, etc.), research areas, projects, and more.
This link is to the High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager whose primary mission is to explore the basic physics of particle acceleration and explosive energy release in solar flares. There is also Reuven Ramaty High-Energy Spectroscopic Imager
This website provides daily reports on space weather. If you sign up for their e-newletter, they send you reports in emails on major solar eruptions (sunspots, solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and aurora).







You don't pay more, we just get a commission -- Click here for more advertisers.
e-mail: livingcosmos@hotmail.com
http://www.livingcosmos.com/solar.htm
Richard Michael Pasichnyk
Copyright 1999-2009
All rights reserved. All copyright laws apply.
Last update: 6-05-09